Chelsea Tactics and Transfers: An opportunity to learn and improve

February 12th 2017, Turf Moor, Burnley, Lancashire; EPL Premier league football, Burnley versus Chelsea; Chelsea Manager Antonio Conte looks disappointed on a cold and snowy match day (Photo by Paul Keevil/Action Plus via Getty Images)
February 12th 2017, Turf Moor, Burnley, Lancashire; EPL Premier league football, Burnley versus Chelsea; Chelsea Manager Antonio Conte looks disappointed on a cold and snowy match day (Photo by Paul Keevil/Action Plus via Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit

Chelsea dropped points against Burnley, but a draw at Turf Moor is a decent result. Moreover, they saw where their vulnerabilities lay.

Chelsea might feel a little bit hard done by following the Burnley match. They might, even though they shouldn’t. At no point in this match did it feel like Chelsea ever got out of second or third gear. Because of that, Burnley were able to play just as well as the Blues. The good news is Chelsea were able to learn about their own weaknesses during the match while not being punished with a loss.

Chelsea still have trouble breaking teams down if they sit back against them. This team can often be accused of accepting a stagnant situation rather than changing it. When the other team is sitting with five men in the box, it will be hard to break them down.

Chelsea need to be more adaptable in an attacking sense rather than the hope-Hazard-does-something-magical-and-Costa-capitalizes attacking plan. What is still lacking from the team is another great creative force. Things opened up when Cesc Fabregas entered the fray slightly but the right wing was still a problem area.

After his goal Pedro never really seemed to make much of an impact and Victor Moses is beginning to show the signs of a long season. With Burnley able to man-mark Diego Costa and keep the ball in front of them while forcing Eden Hazard out wide there was not a lot for Chelsea to do.

More from The Pride of London

It is precisely in matches like this that one sees why the 3-4-3 is likely only a step in the evolutionary process towards a 3-5-2. The team needs more options to attack besides startling wing play.

3-4-3 puts a large emphasis on wing play while also relieving pressure on both the attacking winger and the wing back. They have one another for support at all times. This is not true in a 3-5-2. In 3-5-2 the wing-backs simply need to be dominant and fluent in the language of their position. In both the attacking and defending senses there is no room for mistakes.

Victor Moses, for all his industriousness, is still learning the position. Having said that, he does have the potential to develop into the best wing back in England and maybe even Europe. That will be about coaching and experience.

Alonso may, however, find himself the odd man out eventually. He is too slow to not have a player in the third in front of him. His crossing ability and positional sense are good but ultimately his ceiling physically may be too low.

The reason why the 3-5-2 is the next step is simple. N’Golo Kante and Nemanja Matic for all their horsepower are not creative enough as a midfield pair. They are wildly industrious, but not a single manager in world football is worried about them passing their way to glory. They need a third partner.

Whether that player is Nathaniel Chalobah or Cesc Fabregas now or Lewis Baker or Marco Verratti in the future is unclear. The match against Burnley, though, shows exactly what the limitations of the 3-4-3 are against a disciplined hard fighting team who aren’t awed by the names their playing against.

More from Chelsea FC News

The match was about as classic a British football match as anybody could have wanted. The rain and snow were pouring down and the tackles came fast and thick. It is the sort of match where the ball sticks in the grass an extra second and forces the game to be as much about effort as grace.

Even the great Barcelona side of the mid 2000’s with the genius of Andres Iniesta and Xavi would have had a hard time at Turf Moor. That is why Chelsea should not be at all ashamed of the result and neither, by any means, should Burnley.

What we did see in this match were the limitations to Chelsea’s defense. On a good day, David Luiz possesses all of the skills to be one of the best defenders in the world. What holds him back is the acceptance of his faults.

In several moments during this match he made awful passes that returned a hard won period of possession back to Burnley for free. He also misjudged balls and failed to make necessary clearances. As a defender, there is NO room for mistakes. That comes in your briefing when you decide to play the position.

Must Read: Chelsea FC’s 50 Greatest Players Of All-Time

It wasn’t just Luiz, though. The defense was generally poor. Gary Cahill is showing exactly why Nathan Ake should be licking his lips to start the next match. Cahill misread multiple balls in the air and showed poor match reading ability. His experience and professionalism are what have him in the squad for now.

Cesar Azpilicueta was fine, but not spectacular, and he was slightly out of position on two occasions. He also had an opportunity to shoot and should have hit the target. As per usual from Mr. 7/10.

Cahill deserves respect for everything he has done for Chelsea FC but he, like every member of Chelsea’s surprisingly effective back line this year, should be phased out with time. This defense is a patchwork and it shows at times.

Having been able to learn all of this while not surrendering too many points is a great deal for Chelsea. They played poorly against Burnley. Accept that. Chelsea’s flaws showed today and they are lucky that they weren’t punished for them. All anyone can hope for is that Chelsea learned everything they should have. Also, well played Burnley.