Three big questions: Chelsea’s Mason Mount and being crucial
By Travis Tyler
2. Will he play more as a “winger” or as an eight?
One of the reasons why the Pulisic versus Mount narrative persisted was Mount playing on the wing this season. Mind, it usually came as a response to injuries elsewhere and Frank Lampard does not really use wingers so much as “wingers” so there was some merit in the decision.
Furthermore, Mount also played plenty as an eight and some argument could be made that he played as 10 briefly as well. Next season, Mount will need that versatility if the likes of Kai Havertz joins.
There are arguments and reasons to play Mount in both roles. Higher up, he is given more freedom to roam on and off the ball. Deeper on the pitch, he has more time on the ball and can allow himself better decisions. Overall, he is probably more suited to play deeper than higher up but he has to restrain his press and aggressiveness somewhat to make it viable.
Assuming Havertz does join, Lampard’s most difficult decision will largely come down to Mount or Mateo Kovacic. With Mount, it would most likely be a 4-3-3 with dual eights and a defensive midfielder would be required. With Kovacic, it would be more of a 4-2-3-1 and Lampard can get more fluid with his choice for a third midfielder.
But there is another issue Lampard has and that is a lack of wing depth. Hakim Ziyech, Christian Pulisic, and Callum Hudson-Odoi will be available for two starting spots but that is at least one short of being comfortable. One of Mount, Ross Barkley, or Ruben Loftus-Cheek may have to become one of Lampard’s “wingers” to fill in numbers.
Mount has the reps in the role and Lampard’s trust. It may not be the ideal use of him but it is an option. The real question may not be where Mount plays, but how often he plays where next season.