Chelsea’s 3 best and worst FIFA 23 ratings

Chelsea’s Christian Pulisic

To be perfectly honest, I am impressed with this bunch of scores for the west London outfit, overall. In comparison with the game’s terrible set-piece and penalty playability in recent times, the ratings are bang on in many instances and areas.

With regards to Pulisic’s 82, I feel that this is fairly exact. Though, of course, the entire scoring system is subjective. Nevertheless, on the one hand the American should feel fortunate as he doesn’t showcase his qualities enough for various reasons. On the other, he probably has the capacity to arrive at a higher score if consistency arises in the future. While it’s best to remember that attributes such as pace and strength generally remain the same for most athletes. Captain America is joint-seventh on the Blues’ list.

Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang

Once upon a time, a score of 85 would have been derisive to Aubameyang: a striker who was certainly rated among the best in Europe when at Borussia Dortmund and during stages of his Arsenal tenure. Now, at the age of 33, some of his talents will begin to wain, if they haven’t done so already. For example, speed simply cannot be maintained by nearly all veterans.

Therefore, the clinical finishing of ‘Auba’ and his keen and nimble approach to attacking play keep him at a deadly level of FIFA output. Don’t write Chelsea off with respect to being a decent online team, comparatively, with 80-to-high-80 classifications forming a solid unit.

N’golo Kante

The everlasting Frenchman is again the top-ranking Chels’ star on FIFA 23. Whilst down from 90 to 89 in the issue, Kante will be pleased with this. Injuries and absences could have caused the EA team to downgrade the former Leicester City man further, yet realistic appraising prevailed. If you select the Blues, ensure that you start matches with the irrepressible 31-year-old involved.