Chelsea 1-2 Fulham: Tactical Analysis & Match Report

Explore an in-depth tactical analysis of Chelsea's 1-2 loss to Fulham in the West London derby. Discover how fatigue, defensive frailties, and strategic adjustments shaped this dramatic comeback.

GLYN KIRK/GettyImages
2 of 4

Exploiting Fulham's Structural Weaknesses

The visitor's structural downside became evident early in the game when the Blues created a chance after bypassing the frontline press. In one instance, Traore got his pressing angle wrong, which opened the passing lane from Tosin Adarabioyo to Cucurella. Cucurella then found Jadon Sancho, who cut inside and delivered a dangerous cross into the penalty box.

Fulham were prepared for such situations, though. While their approach did not completely prevent Chelsea from creating chances, they had a contingency plan. The nearest midfielder in the second line of pressure would shift to mark the free Chelsea No. 8, with the rest of the midfielders adjusting their positions. However, this shift left the opposite No. 8 free. Additionally, Fulham’s narrow out-of-possession structure often isolated their wingers in one-on-one situations against the home side's fullbacks.

Fulham's Pressing Dynamics

Fulham’s frontline press, while aggressive and well-drilled, involved a complex set of roles. The striker initially pressed the west London side's centre-back before curving his run to press the goalkeeper, cutting off passing options to Moises Caicedo.

Traore’s role varied; he initially sat off to deny central access but would later press the opposite centre-back. The right winger focused on marking the Blues' left-back. Fulham's No. 10s and midfielders further adapted, with some pressing higher when needed and others providing central coverage.

Defensively, the visitors also assigned man-marking roles. Their left wing-back marked Chelsea's right-back, the right wing-back marked Chelsea's left winger, and the left centre-back marked the right winger. The defensive midfielder stayed on Palmer while the centre-backs maintained a numerical advantage over Nicolas Jackson.

This pressing structure often forced Chelsea to work harder to build from the back. However, Fulham's passive mid-block approach contributed to Chelsea's opening goal. With Palmer cleverly roaming and finding pockets of space, a lapse in concentration was enough to capitalize brilliantly.