Tottenham 3-4 Chelsea: Cole Palmer leads ratings with double penalty haul

Tottenham Hotspur FC v Chelsea FC - Premier League
Tottenham Hotspur FC v Chelsea FC - Premier League | Chris Brunskill/Fantasista/GettyImages
2 of 3

Robert Sanchez: 4/10

Sanchez was put into compromising situations because of his defense, and he cannot be blamed for most of the goals. His distribution, again, was poor, completing just 3/21 long balls. That is abysmal.

Moises Caicedo: 7/10

Caicedo was forced to put in another shift at right back, and he did very well. He was Chelsea's best defender on the night, which is damning, considering he is not a defender at all. He won most of his duels, and his distribution was good.

Benoit Badiashile: 5/10

Badiashile was not great against Spurs. He made an error that led to a shot, and his distribution was generally poor. He was busy defensively, contesting and winning four tackles.

Levi Colwill: 6.5/10

Colwill's distribution was much better than his partner's. His defending was also relatively good. The Blues' defense did not have a good time, especially in the first half.

Marc Cucurella: 3/10

Cucurella was the worst of the four, making two errors that led to goals, making a case for being the sole culprit for two of Tottenham's goals.

Romeo Lavia: 7/10

Lavia was very good. His distribution was perfect, and he was superb defensively. He was also on a yellow card and had already contested seven ground duels, so Enzo Maresca likely didn't want to risk another yellow card.

Enzo Fernandez: 8/10

Fernandez was very good, especially with his distribution and defending. His goal was a perfect way to crown a great performance, and it was so well taken.

Pedro Neto: 6/10

Neto created some chances, but he was generally poor. His dribbling and crossing were average.